Physical therapist · Scientist · Educator

Building a more explicit path from evidence to clinical judgment.

I study how physiology, causal knowledge, and uncertainty can be represented computationally—then used to support transparent reasoning about individual patients.

The premise

Clinical reasoning needs infrastructure.

Scientific papers tell us about populations. Clinical practice asks what is likely true—and what to do next—for one person.

My work examines the space between those two forms of knowledge. It brings together three decades in physical therapy, clinical physiology, cardiovascular research, causal analysis, and education with an emerging program in knowledge representation and scientific AI.

How the program fits together →

The program at a glance

Mechanism. Evidence. Inference.

I

Mechanistic foundation

Understand physiology

Clinically meaningful models of the systems that support muscle function and movement.

Physiolog
II

Population knowledge

Represent the evidence

Curated causal knowledge with provenance, uncertainty, disagreement, and scientific review.

Models4PT
III

Individual reasoning

Ask what follows here

Patient-specific models, Bayesian inference, belief revision, and inspectable explanations.

Inference Engine

Public writing

The Peripatetic Physical Therapist

Essays and reflections for a broader audience on physical therapy, education, science, institutions, and the ideas encountered along the way.

Read on Substack